sometimes artwork can be misleading

you can't even, truly trust the timestamps

I'm going to the archive and running across some very old images.

The first one dates from November of 1999, you must be very cautious with this date, that his original Polaroid photograph taken with a pinhole camera a modified speed graphic which is a 4 x 5 model, I believe this one actually had a shutter curtain although those were quite rare. Now it could be a shuttered lens.

I still have a bunch of shuttered lenses and I still have a very nice hand-held fortified camera, a Lincroft. That would be a Lincroft oh well.

I still have a set of precision pinholes as well but that's for another story.

Now this was high-speed Polaroid black and white film and as I recall it had a speed of about 3000 ASA.

I could be mistaken but it doesn't really matter anymore. It was high-speed black-and-white Polaroid film taken with a handheld speed graphic camera.

This was actually one of my screenshots for an old computer.

Here's all I'm saying, I made the polar Polaroid sometime but it wasn't created or put into a digital format until I scanned it into my computer which was probably November of 1999.

I'm not going to show you two fragments from 2007, from what I call the so-called eBay experiment.

They will round the whole thing off to the year 2009 when I'm concerned about American animation in this state of affairs as it pertains to superheroes in the consumption of beer and pornography. I’m doing this of course for the city of brotherly love.